Thread: Ursa Mini Pro ISO 3200?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
  1. #1 Ursa Mini Pro ISO 3200? 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,012
    Hello beautiful people of BMCuser. Does anyone have any DNG they can share or footage online with the new ISO 3200 on the UMP? Im just really curious
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    589
    I dont have a DNG, but I would not use 3200 ever. 1600 is improved, but will still remain on iso 800 for 99%
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,012
    Thanks polaroid. Is it much improved than the 4.6k you think? I wish someone can compare the ump and p4k at 3200 iso. Im really on the fence on picking up a 4.6k
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    589
    I never had the 4.6K so I dont know, reports of users of facebook groups seem to think so though. BRAW is a thing of magic though. So I would upgrade to the pro just for BRAW alone (the IR and ND filters are a nice plus)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,012
    Quote Originally Posted by polaroid22 View Post
    I never had the 4.6K so I dont know, reports of users of facebook groups seem to think so though. BRAW is a thing of magic though. So I would upgrade to the pro just for BRAW alone (the IR and ND filters are a nice plus)
    Thanks man. That built in nd is pretty sweet. If you dont mind me asking. Do you use any gimbal with your ump?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    589
    Quote Originally Posted by jsfilmz View Post
    Thanks man. That built in nd is pretty sweet. If you dont mind me asking. Do you use any gimbal with your ump?
    I have a ronin with extension arms to fly it. But it gets heavy So maybe I better sell the ronin and get something like a easyrig. Different look though, but the camera looks pretty great using handheld.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,012
    yea that easyrig mini max isnt too bad either
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member jambredz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Kingston, Jamaica
    Posts
    4,288
    From initial tests the 1600 is def more usable now. 3200 is out of the question for me. Not usable.
    Darren Scott
    Freelance Director/Director of Photography


    https://vimeo.com/jambredzvisions/videos
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,012
    Quote Originally Posted by jambredz View Post
    From initial tests the 1600 is def more usable now. 3200 is out of the question for me. Not usable.
    Thanks jam. Ursa mini 4.6k useable too or no? Do you know
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    589
    Quote Originally Posted by jsfilmz View Post
    Thanks jam. Ursa mini 4.6k useable too or no? Do you know
    Unless the latest update from the UMP, it is def not usable on a 4.6k. (at least for me, I know there are guys who live dangerously and carefree)
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. pocket 4k iso 3200 noise
    By jsfilmz in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 108
    Last Post: 12-04-2018, 08:08 PM
  2. 3200 ISO and more in the latest Ursa Mini Pro Update
    By Adam E in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 11-17-2018, 05:06 AM
  3. Mosaic R3 OLPF for Ursa Mini & Ursa Mini Pro
    By hawk in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-17-2018, 08:58 AM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-09-2016, 04:53 PM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-09-2015, 03:48 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •