Thread: S35 Mini Kineraw Camera

Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 92
  1. #61  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    827
    Hi dustylense, my point was not anything negative about the camera or Chinese company, what I meant that BMD is not sleeping, and also they know how to put so much in a small package and do it well.
    BTW I have just ordered FOTGA 500II FF and Rails
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #62  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,397
    Quote Originally Posted by rawCAM35 View Post
    Hi dustylense, my point was not anything negative about the camera or Chinese company, what I meant that BMD is not sleeping, and also they know how to put so much in a small package and do it well.
    BTW I have just ordered FOTGA 500II FF and Rails
    I realize that. My point is though that the Chinese are to be taken very seriously. It's like they are out for world domination. THey just passed the USA in world trading and there is really nothing to stop them from continuing that.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #63  
    I agree on almost all points. Tech support and customer service are going to be on the bad side, but quality will probably be a little over average. Either way, it's going to push other people to make products with competitive advantages.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #64  
    Taking a Vacation
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    345
    Quote Originally Posted by Nikola Ovcharski View Post



    The camera and its modules remind me enough of RED to wonder if there was some industrial espionage at some point. I seem to remember somone realated to RED was suddenly involved in leaking/selling infomation and Jannard was pissed about it. Either way this is a Chinese copy of the RED cameras, thats pretty clear. What often happens is western companies use Chinese factories to maufacture parts and they once they are proficient at it make it and stick their badge on it. In some ways people are geeting ripped off what they pay $30,000 for a RED camera when they were probably made in chinese factories at least the parts for peanuts. So in that sense thinking the product is not as good quality of copied products might be a mistake. It might just be a RED with a different badge....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #65  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,397
    Conspiracy! Spies and moles!
    For sure Bowman. It's called reverse engineering. I agree with you for the most part. I'm sure the RED is chomping at the bit after seeing the similarities going on here. And there's really nothing they can do about it. But I remember when the Epic was first shipping, a very early serial number was stolen. Not sure if it was ever found or recovered. Hmmmmmm....

    It does in fact smell fishy when you look at the A La' Carte menu above. Forget the photo mock up as that's blatant. But still, I really don't care. It's just another capture device.

    2 hdmi ports and only carry a 720p signal out is where I stopped in my tracks.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #66  
    Taking a Vacation
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    345
    its doesn't need an out there conspiracy its simply how it works in Asia from music to cars and everything in between, I live in Asia I know. And its done shamlessly. Western companies are stupid enought to let asian companies ie their competitors make their products and often hand over rights to patents etc to have access to markets then they deserve what they get. Eventually Chinese companies will throw western companies out. For all the praise Steve Jobs got and still gets he seemed surprised when Samsung a major component maker for apple suddenly turned around and made a copycat product. Thats a schoolboy error in my mind.

    Its funny if you replace Kine with RED and mini with Scarlet/Epic the above spec seems even more famililar.

    Of course what this also means is its only a matter of time before we see a Chinese BM Cinema Camera....
    Last edited by bowman; 02-11-2013 at 11:54 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #67  
    You both are on the wrong track, bowman & dustylense. You may be stuck at the end of the twentieth century. But, I assure you China has moved to the twenty-first. Their company is working off of a collaborative effort. Their sensor manufacturer has a history in space cameras and industrial applications, and another partner has a post company. Which is why the first S35 camera was so tied to the Cineform codec and their post production suite. But, like any modern Chinese company, they move fast. They saw the BMCC camera announced at $3000 USD. And figured they had a better option with their S35 sensor and no crop factor. So they ditch the onboard Cineform transform, remove the active cooling and release a chip in a box that will fit in the palm of your hand for $3000. That's not espionage that's just good business and responding to the market.

    While you are on your xenophobic little tirade, think about the possibility that this could just be a committed group of cinema people who do not want to buy an Australian, Japanese, or American digital cinema camera. They just want to be the first company to build their own digital cinema camera for their country.

    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #68  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by bowman View Post
    In some ways people are geeting ripped off what they pay $30,000 for a RED camera when they were probably made in chinese factories at least the parts for peanuts.
    One must consider the incredible amount of time and money that is spent on research and development. Just because manufacturing costs are low, doesn't equate to total costs being low. It's easy for someone to pick up the design and copy. But, it takes blood, sweat, and tears to actually design and develop an innovative product...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #69  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,397
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon7athan View Post
    You both are on the wrong track, bowman & dustylense. You may be stuck at the end of the twentieth century. But, I assure you China has moved to the twenty-first. Their company is working off of a collaborative effort. Their sensor manufacturer has a history in space cameras and industrial applications, and another partner has a post company. Which is why the first S35 camera was so tied to the Cineform codec and their post production suite. But, like any modern Chinese company, they move fast. They saw the BMCC camera announced at $3000 USD. And figured they had a better option with their S35 sensor and no crop factor. So they ditch the onboard Cineform transform, remove the active cooling and release a chip in a box that will fit in the palm of your hand for $3000. That's not espionage that's just good business and responding to the market.

    While you are on your xenophobic little tirade, think about the possibility that this could just be a committed group of cinema people who do not want to buy an Australian, Japanese, or American digital cinema camera. They just want to be the first company to build their own digital cinema camera for their country.

    Whoa, calm down there! If you maybe read a few posts of mine prior, you will actually see that I acknowledge China as a big player. I talk about their rail system and their trade power. Hey Buddy, I've been to China FOUR times. I understand exactly where they stand in the world. More than 3/4 of my clients have work in China. All architects and builders. They have projects flying off the shelves. Why are they hiring US architects???? Why are they Hiring US builders? WHy are they hiring US designers? Lot's of work. Not just China either. China make the US look like cavemen when it comes to their rail systems.

    I glad KineRaw mini is made. I really don't care what it looks like. It just so happens to look like an Epic/Scarlet. Period! Who else thinks that? I mean, really! But I don't care. Two guys that will care are Jim and Jarred and company at RED.
    Scarlet-X_front01-290x290.jpg
    KineRAW-MINI-With-Grip-and-Canon-Lens-2-e1360551335354.jpg

    26053324.jpg

    More power to them, Jon7athan. I have interest in the camera. I've already said that. But there are people who care when it's blatant. A Coca-Cola "can" looks exactly identical to a Pepsi "can" and some have to taste test to tell the difference between the products. So even if the KineMini s35 were 3D print molded exactly like the Epic, I'd still say, "Let's see what they each taste like". And to me, that's all that matters.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #70  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,397
    I also find it funny you post a video where we see the KineFinity, and in nearly every shot there's an Alexa. WHY?..... And even so, I wouldn't care a bit if the Kine 35 beat the crap out of the Alexa's image.
    And the bottom line is, how cool is it that there are people with cameras all over the world doing the things we like to talk about here?

    But when it comes to legalities for some, can I remind you of the Litepanels debacle?
    Reply With Quote  
     

Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •